Buying vs. Renting


From the NY Times:

[Rent vs. Buy]

Of course this applet is no substitute for crunching your own numbers, but in the absence of number-crunching, I plugged in the following constants:

  • $1995/mo. rent
  • $700k house (modest house in San Francisco)
  • 20% down
  • 6.25% mortgage rate
  • 1.00% annual property tax
  • 5% investment return

I left everything else alone. To make it “worth it within 15 years” to buy, one of the following things would have to happen:

  • Home appreciation would have to be 4-5%. Some reports say that SF appreciation is around 2% right now.
  • Rent would have to increase by 10% every year. I have no reference, other than that rent control is 1.7% (we don’t live in a rent-controlled house). A 10% bump sounds plausible, but sounds like a lot.
  • Rate of return on alternative investments would have to drop to 0.50%. An ING Direct savings account gives you 4.50%, and it’s not even the highest rate out there.

In short, the “carrot” to buying a home is for housing prices to fall to about $475k (a huge drop), or for home appreciation to rise again. The “stick” to buying a home is for rent to increase by 10% every year, or for alternative investments to be even worse than real estate.

None of these “carrot” or “stick” events appears likely to happen anytime soon.

Update: I forgot to include the roughly $1000/mo. that the downstairs in-law tenant is probably paying. So with a total monthly rent of $2995/mo. for the comparable $700k house, it looks more reasonable to buy.

  1. #1 by Terence on Thu Apr 12, 2007 - 10:57 am

    Are the values $1995/mo and $700k meant to compare equivalent properties? I would have guessed a higher rent for such a house.

  2. #2 by Rob on Thu Apr 12, 2007 - 11:37 am

    Oops. The downstairs in-law tenant probably pays about $1000/mo., so raising that value to $2995/mo. makes the numbers look more reasonable.

    I guess that makes it a great time to buy, then!

(will not be published)